{"id":706,"date":"2024-09-01T18:23:00","date_gmt":"2024-09-01T21:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ingenieria.uner.edu.ar\/nucleos\/movimiento_humano\/?p=706"},"modified":"2025-09-16T15:44:43","modified_gmt":"2025-09-16T18:44:43","slug":"landing-error-scoring-system-a-scoping-review-about-variants-reference-values-and-differences-according-to-sex-and-sport","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ingenieria.uner.edu.ar\/nucleos\/movimiento_humano\/index.php\/2024\/09\/01\/landing-error-scoring-system-a-scoping-review-about-variants-reference-values-and-differences-according-to-sex-and-sport\/","title":{"rendered":"Landing Error Scoring System: a scoping review about variants, reference values and differences according to sex and sport"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Arletazz M., Dorsch L., Catalfamo-Formento P.<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Phtsical Therapy in Sport<\/em><\/strong><\/h5>\n\n\n\n

Abstract<\/h4>\n\n\n\n

Objective<\/strong>: The Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) is a movement analysis tool proposed to identify the risk of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, very useful for injury prevention. The aim of this study is to review the variants of the LESS, their normative scores and the differences according to sex and sport practiced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Methods<\/strong>: PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases were searched from inception to October 19, 2023. Studies were eligible if the objective was finding normative or reference scores for the LESS, analyze the differences between sexes or sports, or used some variant of the test. Results were limited to available full-text articles published in English in peer-reviewed journals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Results<\/strong>: Of the 360 articles identified, 20 were included for a full analysis (18,093 participants, age = 8\u201330 years, males = 70.6%). The military population was the most frequently analyzed (7 studies, n = 16,603). Results showed six variants of the LESS and average values ranged from 2.56 to 7.1. Males and females showed different pattern landing with errors in different planes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Conclusions<\/strong>: Our findings highlight the need for more field studies on LESS reference scores, particularly for females and basketball or hockey players. Further research is required before conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"\"
Figure 1. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram of the screening process<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Keywords:<\/h4>\n\n\n\n